Dear Sir

Your email has been passed to the Information Governance team to respond.

We will review your subject access request and whether the response provided to you met the Council’s obligations under the General Data Protection Regulations and the Data Protection Act 2018.

We aim to provide a response as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,
Information Rights Officer


-----Original Message-----
From: Jamie Halliday <[FOI #1399708 email]>
Sent: 17 March 2026 17:37
To: CED InformationRights <[email address]>
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Retention periods and disposal controls for pupil records, SEND, exclusions and EOTAS

[You don't often get email from [FOI #1399708 email]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Caution: This email originated from outside of the Council network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe. If in doubt, please contact the IT Service Desk.


Dear Gateshead Council Information Requests Team,

Thank you for your response dated 13 March 2026 (ref: CC67437).

I have two points to raise.

1. Incomplete disclosure – retention schedule entries (Question 1)

The document attached to your response (Corporate Retention Policy, February 2025) is a framework policy explaining how retention periods should be determined. It does not itself contain the specific retention schedule entries I requested for the categories listed in Question 1 (pupil files, SEND records, exclusions, EOTAS, alternative provision, and related finance records).

The policy refers to a 'Common Corporate Retention Periods' document at Appendix 1, described as a separate PDF. That document was not provided.

Please provide Appendix 1 – the Common Corporate Retention Periods document – along with any service-specific ROPA entries or equivalent retention schedule entries for the categories listed in Question 1 of my original request. If specific retention periods for education records are not contained in the corporate document, please provide whatever service-level documentation holds those entries.

2. Question 2 – retention schedule in force 2010 to 2014

Your response states that it has not been possible to confirm whether a formal retention schedule was in place between 2010 and 2014, and suggests the Education Department may have been following IRMS guidance for schools.

I would like to clarify: my request was directed at records held by the local authority, not at maintained schools. The IRMS toolkit for schools is not a substitute for the council's own documented retention arrangements. The council, as a data controller and public authority, would have been subject to records management obligations throughout this period.

Please confirm:
a) whether any documented retention policy, schedule, or guidance existed for council-held education records during 2010–2014 – even informally or in draft form; and
b) who conducted the search for this information, and what sources or systems were checked.

If you are unable to locate any documentation, please confirm that in writing as part of your formal response, rather than by way of suggestion.

3. Question 4 – council oversight of maintained schools

Your response states that there is no role for the council in ensuring maintained schools comply with records management, on the basis that schools are their own data controller.

While I accept that maintained schools are separate data controllers for the purposes of data protection law, my question concerned the council's recorded guidance and oversight role more broadly – including under the Education Act framework and the council's function as the responsible local authority. This includes any guidance issued by the council to schools regarding SARs, educational records requests, and retention expectations.

Please confirm whether the council holds any recorded guidance, circulars, or communications issued to maintained schools on these matters. If no such documentation exists, please confirm that explicitly.

Yours faithfully,
Jamie Halliday



-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #1399708 email]

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/officers

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the latest advice from the ICO:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-guidance-for-authorities
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-anonymisation-code

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
***********************************

Important Information

This e-mail and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Gateshead Council.

If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Communications by e-mail are not guaranteed to be private or secure.

Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this e-mail in error.


***********************************
